-
1.
SGLT2 Inhibitors and Their Antiarrhythmic Properties.
Kolesnik, E, Scherr, D, Rohrer, U, Benedikt, M, Manninger, M, Sourij, H, von Lewinski, D
International journal of molecular sciences. 2022;(3)
Abstract
Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are gaining ground as standard therapy for heart failure with a class-I recommendation in the recently updated heart failure guidelines from the European Society of Cardiology. Different gliflozins have shown impressive beneficial effects in patients with and without diabetes mellitus type 2, especially in reducing the rates for hospitalization for heart failure, yet little is known on their antiarrhythmic properties. Atrial and ventricular arrhythmias were reported by clinical outcome trials with SGLT2 inhibitors as adverse events, and SGLT2 inhibitors seemed to reduce the rate of arrhythmias compared to placebo treatment in those trials. Mechanistical links are mainly unrevealed, since hardly any experiments investigated their impact on arrhythmias. Prospective trials are currently ongoing, but no results have been published so far. Arrhythmias are common in the heart failure population, therefore the understanding of possible interactions with SGLT2 inhibitors is crucial. This review summarizes evidence from clinical data as well as the sparse experimental data of SGLT2 inhibitors and their effects on arrhythmias.
-
2.
Renal, cardiovascular and safety outcomes of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy in East and South-East Asian countries: Results from the Canagliflozin and Renal Events in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation Trial.
Wada, T, Mori-Anai, K, Kawaguchi, Y, Katsumata, H, Tsuda, H, Iida, M, Arakawa, K, Jardine, MJ
Journal of diabetes investigation. 2022;(1):54-64
Abstract
AIMS/INTRODUCTION The sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, canagliflozin, reduced kidney failure and cardiovascular events in the Canagliflozin and Renal Events in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation (CREDENCE) trial. We carried out a post-hoc analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in a subgroup of participants in East and South-East Asian (EA) countries who are at high risk of renal complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS Participants with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 30 to <90 mL/min/1.73 m2 and urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio of >300-5,000 mg/g were randomized to 100 mg of canagliflozin or a placebo. The effects of canagliflozin treatment on pre-specified efficacy and safety outcomes were examined using Cox proportional hazards regression between participants from EA countries (China, Japan, Malaysia, the Philippines, South Korea and Taiwan) and the remaining participants. RESULTS Of 4,401 participants, 604 (13.7%) were from EA countries; 301 and 303 were assigned to the canagliflozin and placebo groups, respectively. Canagliflozin lowered the risk of primary outcome (composite of end-stage kidney disease, doubling of serum creatinine level, or renal or cardiovascular death) in EA participants (hazard ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.35-0.84). The effects of canagliflozin on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in EA participants were generally similar to those of the remaining participants. Safety outcomes were similar between the EA and non-EA participants. CONCLUSIONS In the CREDENCE trial, the risk of renal and cardiovascular events was safely reduced in participants from EA countries at high risk of renal events.
-
3.
Renoprotection with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in children: Knowns and unknowns.
Jiang, B, Cheng, Z, Liu, F, Li, Q, Fu, H, Mao, J
Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.). 2022;(2):126-132
Abstract
Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors represent novel hypoglycemic drugs for the treatment of adult diabetes that have shown considerable potential for cardioprotection and renoprotection. This new drug can inhibit SGLT2 at the proximal tubule, increase glucosuria and natriuresis, and thus decreases the serum glucose level and blood pressure. Furthermore, the tubuloglomerular feedback activated by the natriuresis can decrease glomerular hyperfiltration, acknowledged as the main foundation of renoprotection. Several studies have confirmed the protective effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on the kidneys of adult diabetic patients and those with non-diabetic nephropathy; however, limited researches are seen in paediatric patients. In this review, we have summarized the mechanisms of action of SGLT2 inhibitors, the current experiences in adults, results of exploratory studies in children, and adverse events & obstacles of paediatric use. We further explore the potential and possible future research direction of SGLT2 inhibitors in paediatric diseases.
-
4.
Cardiovascular risk reduction throughout GLP-1 receptor agonist and SGLT2 inhibitor modulation of epicardial fat.
Iacobellis, G, Baroni, MG
Journal of endocrinological investigation. 2022;(3):489-495
Abstract
Epicardial adipose tissue is a novel cardiovascular risk factor. It plays a role in the progression of coronary artery disease, heart failure and atrial fibrillation. Given its rapid metabolism, clinical measurability, and modifiability, epicardial fat works well as therapeutic target of drugs modulating the adipose tissue. Epicardial fat responds to glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1A) and sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i). GLP-1A and SGLT2i provide weight loss and cardiovascular protective effects beyond diabetes control, as recently demonstrated. The potential of modulating the epicardial fat morphology and genetic profile with targeted pharmacological agents can open new avenues in the pharmacotherapy of diabetes and obesity, with particular focus on cardiovascular risk reduction.
-
5.
Meta-Analysis Assessing the Impact of Major Co-Morbidities, Gender, and Race on Cardiovascular Efficacy of Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter-2 Inhibitors Among Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved or Reduced Ejection Fraction.
Patoulias, D, Papadopoulos, C, Imprialos, K, Stavropoulos, K, Doumas, M
The American journal of cardiology. 2022;:201-205
-
6.
Ipragliflozin Improves the Hepatic Outcomes of Patients With Diabetes with NAFLD.
Takahashi, H, Kessoku, T, Kawanaka, M, Nonaka, M, Hyogo, H, Fujii, H, Nakajima, T, Imajo, K, Tanaka, K, Kubotsu, Y, et al
Hepatology communications. 2022;(1):120-132
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) are now widely used to treat diabetes, but their effects on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) remain to be determined. We aimed to evaluate the effects of SGLT2is on the pathogenesis of NAFLD. A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial was conducted in patients with type 2 diabetes with NAFLD. The changes in glycemic control, obesity, and liver pathology were compared between participants taking ipragliflozin (50 mg/day for 72 weeks; IPR group) and participants being managed without SGLT2is, pioglitazone, glucagon-like peptide-1 analogs, or insulin (CTR group). In the IPR group (n = 25), there were significant decreases in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and body mass index (BMI) during the study (HbA1c, -0.41%, P < 0.01; BMI, -1.06 kg/m2 , P < 0.01), whereas these did not change in the CTR group (n = 26). Liver pathology was evaluated in 21/25 participants in the IPR/CTR groups, and hepatic fibrosis was found in 17 (81%) and 18 (72%) participants in the IPR and CTR groups at baseline. This was ameliorated in 70.6% (12 of 17) of participants in the IPR group and 22.2 % (4 of 18) of those in the CTR group (P < 0.01). Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) resolved in 66.7% of IPR-treated participants and 27.3% of CTR participants. None of the participants in the IPR group developed NASH, whereas 33.3% of the CTR group developed NASH. Conclusion: Long-term ipragliflozin treatment ameliorates hepatic fibrosis in patients with NAFLD. Thus, ipragliflozin might be effective for the treatment and prevention of NASH in patients with diabetes, as well as improving glycemic control and obesity. Therefore, SGLT2is may represent a therapeutic choice for patients with diabetes with NAFLD, but further larger studies are required to confirm these effects.
-
7.
Cardiorenal protection with SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with diabetes mellitus: from biomarkers to clinical outcomes in heart failure and diabetic kidney disease.
Liu, H, Sridhar, VS, Boulet, J, Dharia, A, Khan, A, Lawler, PR, Cherney, DZI
Metabolism: clinical and experimental. 2022;:154918
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is one of the most common causes of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cardiovascular (CV) disease. Until recently, glycemic and BP control were the cornerstones for preventing progression of CKD and CV disease associated with T2D. However, there has been a paradigm shift in treatment since the publication of the first clinical trial demonstrating benefits of sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in 2015. SGLT2 inhibitors have been shown to reduce the risk of major adverse CV events and progression of kidney disease in the setting of T2D. However, the elucidation of mechanisms of underlying these clinical benefits is the subject of ongoing investigation. Experimental studies have shown that SGLT2 inhibitors have diverse pleiotropic effects such as modulation of neurohormones such as the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, increasing hematocrit, altering energy substrate use, and attenuating systemic inflammation and oxidative stress, all of which have been implicated in the CV and kidney protective effects of SGLT2 inhibitors. In this review, we highlight biomarkers linked with diabetic kidney disease and heart failure and discuss how SGLT2 inhibitor-associated changes potentially mediate the cardiorenal protection observed with these therapies.
-
8.
Meta-Analysis Addressing the Effect of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors on Flow-Mediated Dilation in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
Patoulias, D, Papadopoulos, C, Kassimis, G, Vassilikos, V, Karagiannis, A, Doumas, M
The American journal of cardiology. 2022;:133-135
-
9.
Association of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors With Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Other Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease: A Meta-analysis.
Bhattarai, M, Salih, M, Regmi, M, Al-Akchar, M, Deshpande, R, Niaz, Z, Kulkarni, A, Siddique, M, Hegde, S
JAMA network open. 2022;(1):e2142078
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The cardiovascular outcome in selected populations when sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2-Is) are emerging as standard therapy is not clearly understood. It is important to learn the magnitude of cardiovascular benefit using SGLT2-Is across the select subgroups that include both sexes and multiple age and racial and ethnic groups. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the association between use of SGLT2-Is and cardiovascular benefits in a prespecified group in a larger sample size using data obtained from randomized clinical trials. DATA SOURCES Search of electronic databases PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Cochrane from inception to January 10, 2021, with additional studies identified through conference papers and meeting presentations, ClinicalTrials.gov, and reference lists of published studies. STUDY SELECTION Placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials in which participants had atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or risk factors for ASCVD, diabetes, or heart failure and which reported the primary outcome were included in this study. Multicenter observational and nonobservational studies and those with different outcomes of interest were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Medical Subject Heading search terms included SGLT2-I and multiple cardiovascular outcomes in different combinations. The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. The analysis of all outcomes was performed using a Mantel-Haenszel equation and the random-effects model. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Six efficacy outcomes of SGLT2-I use (cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure [HHF] as the primary outcome and major adverse cardiovascular event, HHF, cardiovascular death, acute myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality as secondary outcomes), were evaluated. Subgroup analysis was performed for the primary outcome of cardiovascular death or HHF. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were used to compare 2 interventions. RESULTS Ten studies with 71 553 participants were included, among whom 39 053 received SGLT2-Is; among studies that reported these data, 28 809 were men and 15 655 were women (mean age, 65.2 [range, 61.9-70.0] years). Race and ethnicity were defined in the original trials and were categorized as Asian, Black, or other (6900 participants) and White (26 646 participants) for the purposes of this analysis (the category "other" was not specified consistently). In terms of age, 16 793 were younger than 65 years and 17 087 were 65 years or older. At a mean follow-up 2.3 (range, 0.8-4.2) years, the SGLT2-I group favored reduction in primary outcome (3165 of 39 053 [8.10%] vs 3756 of 32 500 [11.56%]; OR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.55-0.80]; P < .001). No difference was noted in the rate of acute myocardial infarction compared with the placebo group (1256 of 26 931 [4.66%] vs 958 of 20 373 [4.70%]; OR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.87-1.03]; P = .22). Subgroup analysis favored SGLT2-I use for the primary outcome in both sexes, age groups, and racial and ethnic groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This meta-analysis supports that SGLT2-Is have emerged as an effective class of drugs for improving cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in selected patients. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors were not associated with reduced risk of acute myocardial infarction. Future long-term prospective studies are warranted to understand the long-term cardiovascular benefits.
-
10.
Do background ischemic heart disease and baseline left ventricular ejection fraction affect cardiovascular efficacy of SGLT-2 inhibitors in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction?
Patoulias, D, Papadopoulos, C, Kassimis, G, Doumas, M
Journal of cardiovascular medicine (Hagerstown, Md.). 2022;(1):e30-e32